Comparing academic performance across states has historically been difficult because each state administers its own assessments and establishes its own performance standards.
The Stanford Education Data Archive, commonly known as SEDA, brings state assessment data together on a nationally comparable scale. Developed by Stanford University’s Educational Opportunity Project, SEDA allows educators, policymakers, and community leaders to explore patterns in educational opportunity across schools, districts, communities, and states.
SEDA does not explain why a particular pattern exists. Instead, it provides a valuable starting point for asking better questions and identifying schools or communities that may warrant deeper study. SEDA provides information related to:
Achievement: How average academic performance compares with national patterns
Learning Rates: How much students learn as they progress through grade levels
Trends: How achievement and learning rates are changing over time
Educational Opportunity: How academic outcomes relate to community and socioeconomic conditions
"The Stanford Education Data Archive (SEDA) is an initiative aimed at harnessing data to help scholars, policymakers, educators, and parents learn how to improve educational opportunity for all children."
Visit Stanford University’s Educational Opportunity Project to explore current SEDA data and reports.
NOTE: The video is from an older iteration of the data in 2019, explore the newest data with some enhancements in 2026.
Similar to the Reading Now Network, SEDA displays much of their data on a scatterplot in relation to poverty. According to Stanford, "Average Test Scores are influenced by opportunities to learn at home, in neighborhoods, in child-care, preschool, and after-school programs, from peers and friends, and at school." Users are encouraged to also look at those schools beating the odds as if there were an imaginary 'best fit' line drawn through the middle.
After Stanford aligns state tests to the NAEP, they find the national average for each grade such 3rd grade is 3.0, 4th grade is 4.0, etc. Growth is explained by following a group of students as they progress through the grades.
How does proficiency on the NAEP (aka Nation's Report Card) compare to proficiency on the M-STEP?
In 2019, from a sample of MI students, 32% of students were proficient on the NAEP. Whereas, 46% of students were proficient on the M-STEP (both in 4th grade ELA). That is because the NAEP has a higher benchmark than the M-STEP.